Northeast Building Supply, LLC v. Morrill
Citations
- 224 Conn. App. 137
Syllabus
The plaintiff, N Co., appealed to this court from the judgment of the trial court denying its application for a prejudgment remedy pursuant to statute (§ 52-278a et seq.). N Co.'s proposed complaint alleged common- law and statutory vexatious litigation claims that arose out of an earlier action to which N Co. was not a party. The trial court in the earlier action had rendered judgment for H Co., the plaintiff in that action, and it awarded attorney's fees to H Co. H Co. thereafter changed its name to B Co., and B Co. assigned the judgment obtained in the earlier action and all related claims arising out of such litigation to N Co. The defen- dants named in the present action were either defendants in the earlier action or attorneys and law firms who represented those defendants. The court in the present action thereafter denied N Co.'s application, concluding that its proposed vexatious litigation claims were barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel and that the payment of any judgment rendered against the law firm defendants would be adequately secured by insurance. Held that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over N Co.'s application for a prejudgment remedy, as N Co. lacked standing to bring the application predicated on its vexatious litigation claims: N Co.'s claims fell squarely within the category of tort claims that may not be assigned, as its alleged damages included, inter alia, claims of injuries to H Co.'s business reputation and attorney's fees necessary for the defense of claims against H Co., which were personal in nature and accrued only to H Co. and not to N Co.; accordingly, this court reversed the trial court's judgment and directed the trial court to dismiss N Co.'s application. Argued November 14, 2023—officially released March 5, 2024
Judges: Moll; Clark; Seeley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-08-20· cited 503×
- Bouchard v. People's BankSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-09· cited 383×
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court· 2004-07-09· cited 334×
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-12· cited 323×
- Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-30· cited 247×
- Falls Church Group, Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-01-23· cited 89×
- Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-08-15· cited 72×
- Rioux v. BarrySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-31· cited 71×
- Chervin v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-12-26· cited 53×
- King v. SultarSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-06-06· cited 41×
- Gurski v. Rosenblum and Filan, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-11-22· cited 35×
- Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. DunicanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-22· cited 31×
- Mall v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-12-28· cited 22×
- Stearns & Wheeler, LLC v. Kowalsky Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-10-07· cited 19×
- Ims v. Town of PortsmouthSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2011-12-09· cited 18×
- Whitaker v. GavitSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1847-07-15· cited 17×
- Tomkovich v. MistevichMichigan Supreme Court· 1923-03-23· cited 9×
- Zabelle v. CoratoloD. Connecticut· 1993-01-26· cited 5×
- Northeast Builders Supply & Home Centers, LLC v. RMM Consulting, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-01-26· cited 4×
- Bozelko v. MiliciConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-12-11· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.