Skip to main content
· 4/28/1994

Mall v. Labow

Citations

  • 229 Conn. 912
  • 642 A.2d 1208
  • 1994 Conn. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The implied covenant . . . was rescinded and abrogated by the deed . . . whereby [the owner] acquired the fee simple title . . . and consequently all right[s that] . . . could be derived only from the implied covenant of the parties, no longer existed.”
  • “The implied covenant . . . was rescinded and abrogated by the deed . . . whereby [the owner] acquired the fee simple title . . . and consequently all right[s that] . . . could be derived only from the implied covenant of the parties, no longer existed.”
  • “The implied covenant . . . was rescinded and abrogated by the deed . . . whereby [the owner] acquired the fee simple title . . . and consequently all right[s that] . . . could be derived only from the implied covenant of the parties, no longer existed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.