North v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding testimony where the expert relied on an incomplete medical history and did not include pre-existing conditions, including a second car accident involving a plaintiff
• permitting life care planner testimony and explaining that to the extent the movant believed the life care planner did not have all necessary information, “those issues are a matter of credibility and weight to be brought out in cross-examination and resolved by the jury.”
• fact that expert was not provided with “all of the professional information that she said would be needed” was a matter of the weight, not admissibility, of her testimony
• rejecting testimony of psychologist who relied on incomplete information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).