Norman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that lay opinions on the identity of drugs can be offered so long as the opinion is not based on “training and [] specialized experience”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. LDonna Marie Youmans
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2016-10-24· cited 8×
• Carter v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2014-11-12
• State of Delaware v. Randolph Lucas
  Delaware Court of Common Pleas· 2015-09-02
• State of Delaware v. Taylor.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-11-23
• Robinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2016-10-13
• Salaberrios v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2017-01-20
• Malik J. Moss v. State of Delaware
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2017-06-28
• Booker v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2017-07-14
• Houston v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2021-04-20
• State v. Ray
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2021-05-19
• Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2024-09-05

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• Kyles v. Whitley
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
• Seward v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1999-01-22· cited 66×
• Atkinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2001-07-18· cited 29×
• Wright v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-02-11· cited 11×