D. Delaware· 9/4/2018
Norman v. Elkin
Citations
- 338 F. Supp. 3d 361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a corporation’s public filings disclosing certain business practices “should have prompted investigation by [a shareholder plaintiff] into potential wrongdoing.”
- conversion claim time-barred because reasonable investigation would have led to discovery of the injury
- same regarding SLA-based breach of fiduciary duty claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Marra v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityThird Circuit· 2007-08-28· cited 463×
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareFederal Circuit· 1984-04-06· cited 392×
- Pannu v. Iolab Corp.Federal Circuit· 1998-08-06· cited 245×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1995-11-15· cited 170×
- Dawn Equipment Co. v. Kentucky Farms Inc.Federal Circuit· 1998-03-24· cited 167×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2004-08-24· cited 105×
- United States Cellular Investment Co. of Allentown v. Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1996-05-29· cited 53×
- Jeffrey Norman v. David ElkinThird Circuit· 2017-06-13· cited 30×
- Seidel v. LeeD. Delaware· 1996-12-30· cited 29×
- Norman v. ElkinD. Delaware· 2010-07-30· cited 7×
- Norman v. ElkinD. Delaware· 2012-03-26· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.