Norman Seay v. Tim Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that omission of funding contingency for advance voting caused summary statement to be misleading
• When a party challenges a legislatively prepared ballot summary “ ‘[t]he burden is on the opponents of the language to show that the language was insufficient [or] unfair.’ ”
• “When a party challenges the language of the summary statement, [t]he burden is on the opponents of the language to show that the language was insufficient and unfair.” (quoting Overfelt v. McCaskill, 81 S.W.3d 732, 738 (Mo. App. W.D. 2002

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).