Fenberg v. Goggin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because a party = s illusory promise cannot constitute consideration in exchange for the other party = s performance, there was no unilateral contract
• “A promise is illusory when one party retains the unilateral right to amend the agreement and avoid its obligations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).