Skip to main content
D. Connecticut· 8/8/2017

Noffsinger v. SSC Niantic Operating Co.

Citations

  • 273 F. Supp. 3d 326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “without a private cause of action, [the statute in question] would have no practical effect, because the law does not provide for any other enforcement mechanism.”
  • concluding that Connecticut medical cannabis statutes implied a private right of action for employment discrimination and SUPREME COURT Or NEVADA (0) I947A 44 1 ,DIr> 12 rejecting a public policy tort claim as precluded by the private right of action
  • noting that the CSA does not “purport to regulate employment practices in any manner”
  • noting that the CSA does not “purport to regulate employment practices in any manner”
  • considering whether the CSA preempts a state law provision precluding certain forms of employment discrimination against medical marijuana users, court observes that “[t]he CSA . . . does not make it illegal to employ a marijuana user”
  • considering whether the CSA preempts a state law provision precluding certain forms of employment discrimination against medical marijuana users, court observes that “[t]he CSA . . . does not make it illegal to employ a marijuana user”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Noffsinger v. SSC Niantic Operating Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.