Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 5/16/2008

Noble v. Sombrotto

Citations

  • 525 F.3d 1230
  • 381 U.S. App. D.C. 136
  • 184 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2134
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10546
  • 2008 WL 2065834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding where district court failed to discuss evidence of “bad faith” and advising court to “closely scrutinize self-serving” evidence
  • noting that this factual finding is “conclusive on remand”
  • examining whether payments to union officers were authorized by the union’s constitution
  • \The officers had a direct financial incentive\ to substantiate expenses because \each officer could easily have avoided a substantial additional tax liability by keeping and submitting receipts for legitimate union-related expenses he or she incurred each month.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Kavanaugh, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Noble v. Sombrotto

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.