Theodore Ex Rel. A.G. v. Government of District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Theodore’s requests for additional evaluations and an IEP meeting were moot because a judgment would not “presently affect the parties’ rights”
• “Although ‘detailed factual allegations’ are not necessary to withstand a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, to provide the ‘grounds’ of ‘entitle[ment] to relief,’ a plaintiff must furnish ‘more than labels and conclusions’ or ‘a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).