Noble Security, Inc. v. MIZ Engineering, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the injury to business and property and causation are viewed as standing elements
• holding the court could exercise “pendent personal jurisdiction over claims arising from a common nucleus of operative fact, whether the additional claim is a state claim or a federal claim”
• noting that the jurisdictional inquiry under RICO 4 A district court also has jurisdiction over certain other types of cases, but this case does not fall into any of those categories. E.g., 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345, 1346 (United States or its agency is a plaintiff or defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).