E.D. Virginia· 4/14/2009
Noble Security, Inc. v. MIZ Engineering, Ltd.
Citations
- 611 F. Supp. 2d 513
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32415
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the injury to business and property and causation are viewed as standing elements
- holding the court could exercise “pendent personal jurisdiction over claims arising from a common nucleus of operative fact, whether the additional claim is a state claim or a federal claim”
- noting that the jurisdictional inquiry under RICO 4 A district court also has jurisdiction over certain other types of cases, but this case does not fall into any of those categories. E.g., 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345, 1346 (United States or its agency is a plaintiff or defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mark S. Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Taylor v. BettisE.D. North Carolina· 2013-09-30· cited 36×
- Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc. v. Actsoft, Inc.D. Colorado· 2010-01-21· cited 10×
- New Venture Holdings v. Devito Verdi, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2019-03-21· cited 9×
- Galustian v. PeterE.D. Virginia· 2010-11-09· cited 3×
- Nathan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.Fairfax County Circuit Court· 2011-08-02· cited 3×
- People Express Airlines, Inc. v. 200 Kelsey Associates, LLCE.D. Virginia· 2013-02-05· cited 3×
- Lianyungang Firstdart Tackle Co. v. DSM Dyneema B.V.E.D. North Carolina· 2012-06-28· cited 2×
Cites
59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 7,025×
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court· 2006-02-22· cited 6,493×
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 3,595×
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,488×
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,478×
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 3,198×
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court· 1977-06-24· cited 2,976×
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1952-03-03· cited 1,544×
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 1,453×
- Adams v. BainFourth Circuit· 1982-12-30· cited 1,091×
- David T. Combs Sarah E. Combs v. James O. Bakker Tammy Faye Bakker Richard DortchFourth Circuit· 1989-09-26· cited 730×
- Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Carefirst Pregnancy Centers, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2003-07-02· cited 599×
- IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. HerrmannSecond Circuit· 1993-11-19· cited 531×
- Richard Augustine v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1983-04-26· cited 471×
- Consulting Engineers Corp. v. Geometric Ltd.Fourth Circuit· 2009-03-23· cited 470×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.