Nisenzon v. Sadowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a fraudulent transfer claim reduced to a money judgment can evince a “right to payment” such that it could create creditor status for a separate fraudulent conveyance claim under the uniform act
• holding judgment was void as against individual partners in a business partnership because they were not named as parties to the suit, were not served with process, and did not waive service of the summons and complaint
• finding that the plaintiff had an UFTA claim against his debtor’s attorney based on Rhode Island’s version of UFTA because the attorney was the transferee of a fraudulent transfer from the debtor and subsequently transferred the property to another entity
• finding under Rhode Island fraud conveyance statute, adequacy of consideration is for fact-finder, and reviewable only for clear error
• defining a false representation as it pertains to a claim of fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).