Credit Union Central Falls v. Groff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the intervenor established an interest different in kind from the current parties because she not only claimed an interest in the funds, she claimed an interest that was superior to that of the other parties
• determining that intervenor’s interest was different in kind in that she claimed priority over other claimants to the limited funds in a client account
• \party must produce some tangible basis to support a claim of purported inadequacy\ (internal citation and quotations omitted)
• action by former client against attorney for recovery of client funds would \impair or impede\ ability of another former client to secure funds from same client trust account

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).