Supreme Court of Delaware· 4/30/1987
Nicolet, Inc. v. Nutt
Citations
- 525 A.2d 146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that the elements of civil conspiracy are: “(1) [a] confederation or combination of two or more persons; (2) [a]n unlawful act done in furtherance of the conspiracy; and (3) [a]etual damage.”
- setting forth elements plaintiff must prove for civil conspiracy, including “an unlawful act done in furtherance of the conspiracy”
- setting forth elements plaintiff must prove for civil conspiracy, including “an unlawful act done in furtherance of the conspiracy”
- noting in dicta that manufacturer of asbestos products has no duty to warn customers of other asbestos manufacturers regarding hazards of exposure to asbestos
- “[t]o establish a prima facie case of intentional representation (fraudulent concealment),” plaintiff must prove “[a]n intent to induce plaintiff’s reliance upon the” defendant’s deliberate concealment
- fraud may occur “through deliberate concealment of material facts, or by silence in the face of a duty to speak.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Christie, Horsey, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
134 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brzoska v. OlsonSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-09-08· cited 367×
- Allied Capital Corp. v. GC-Sun Holdings, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2006-11-22· cited 307×
- Mills Acquisition Co. v. MacMillan, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-05-03· cited 245×
- Aeroglobal Capital Management, LLC v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2005-03-23· cited 205×
- Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.Eighth Circuit· 1997-05-16· cited 195×
- American International Group, Inc. v. GreenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2009-02-10· cited 175×
- In Re Tri-Star Pictures, Inc., LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-12-08· cited 169×
- Gaulding v. Celotex Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1989-06-07· cited 104×
- Nelson v. ElwaySupreme Court of Colorado· 1995-12-11· cited 99×
- Roland Riddell v. Riddell Washington CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1989-02-03· cited 96×
- Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-12-22· cited 80×
- Zirn v. VLI Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1993-03-08· cited 78×
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Verestar, Inc. v. American Tower Corp. (In Re Verestar, Inc.)S.D. New York· 2006-06-09· cited 73×
- Total Care Physicians, P.A. v. O'HaraSuperior Court of Delaware· 2001-03-23· cited 68×
- Pizza Management, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.D. Kansas· 1990-05-11· cited 63×
- HMG/Courtland Properties, Inc. v. GrayCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1999-07-12· cited 54×
- Anderson v. A.P.I. Co. of MinnesotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 45×
- Lipson v. Anesthesia Services, P.A.Superior Court of Delaware· 2001-10-03· cited 45×
- Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. Dentsply International, Inc.D. New Mexico· 2010-03-23· cited 43×
- Central Wesleyan College v. W.R. Grace & Co.D. South Carolina· 1992-09-04· cited 36×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stephenson v. Capano Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-05-24· cited 254×
- Laventhol, Krekstein, Horwath & Horwath v. TuckmanSupreme Court of Delaware· 1976-11-23· cited 53×
- In Re Asbestos LitigationSuperior Court of Delaware· 1986-04-04· cited 48×
- McLaughlin v. CopelandD. Delaware· 1978-06-15· cited 38×
- Dixie Cup Co. v. Paper Container Mfg. Co.Supreme Court· 1949-02-07· cited 32×
- Gibbons v. BrandtSeventh Circuit· 1948-05-04· cited 24×
- Marshall v. Celotex Corp.E.D. Michigan· 1987-02-17· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.