Supreme Court of Vermont· 4/30/2010
Nichols, Wool v. Hofmann
Citations
- 188 Vt. 1
- 2010 VT 36
- 998 A.2d 1040
- 2010 Vt. LEXIS 36
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The groups must be comprised of similarly situated persons so that the factor motivating the alleged discrimination can be identified.”
- “The groups must be comprised of similarly situated persons so that the factor motivating the alleged discrimination can be identified.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reiber, Dooley, Johnson, Skoglund, Burgess
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ying Ji v. HeideSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-09-13· cited 27×
- Coutu v. Town of CavendishSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-02-25· cited 13×
- Deutsche Bank v. Kevin PinetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-06-24· cited 13×
- Bain v. Windham County Sheriff Keith ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont· 2012-03-02· cited 11×
- In re BlowSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-08-30· cited 5×
- State v. Joseph Leland BruyetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 2021-06-11· cited 1×
- Twin Pines Housing Trust and Dismas of Vermont CUVermont Superior Court· 2013-04-26
- young v. pallitoVermont Superior Court· 2024-04-02
- wool v. menardVermont Superior Court· 2024-04-02
- VT Woodchips Real Estate Holdings LLC CU & SP - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court· 2022-03-11
- Wool v. MenardVermont Superior Court· 2020-03-23
- Butler v. TouchetteVermont Superior Court· 2021-04-30
- Brochu v. TouchetteVermont Superior Court· 2021-03-19
- Young v. PallitoVermont Superior Court· 2017-10-04
- Lockerby v. DocVermont Superior Court· 2025-03-27
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 7,112×
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court· 2008-06-09· cited 1,599×
- Basim Esmail, Zabco Enterprises, Incorporated, and Nazco Enterprises, Incorporated v. Samuel T. MacRane Jr.Seventh Circuit· 1995-04-19· cited 242×
- Bock v. GoldSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-06-10· cited 160×
- Lubinsky v. Fair Haven Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-02-28· cited 120×
- Richards v. Town of NorwichSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-01-29· cited 97×
- Thomas v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-29· cited 82×
- Amiot v. AmesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-02-28· cited 74×
- People v. Dat Tan NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-04-25· cited 71×
- Delta Psi Fraternity v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-10-10· cited 46×
- Petition of Allied Power and Light CompanySupreme Court of Vermont· 1974-03-29· cited 26×
- Endres v. EndresSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-10-25· cited 14×
- Girouard v. HofmannSupreme Court of Vermont· 2009-06-19· cited 10×
- Bishop v. MoranD. Rhode Island· 1987-12-02· cited 7×
- Slater v. McKinnaSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-04-10· cited 5×
- Tucker v. AngeloneE.D. Virginia· 1997-01-29· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.