Skip to main content

Endres v. Endres

Citations

  • 2006 VT 108
  • 912 A.2d 975
  • 180 Vt. 640
  • 2006 Vt. LEXIS 307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that intent is an element of battery that requires an allegation that defendant knew he was infected
  • affirming the dismissal of plaintiff’s IIED claim against her former husband because she could not prove the intent required for an IIED claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.