Skip to main content
· 6/13/2003

Nichols v. State Farm Mut.

Citations

  • 851 So. 2d 742
  • 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8794
  • 2003 WL 21359343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that terms and conditions of a proposal for settlement should be devoid of ambiguity, patent or latent
  • “Rules 1.442(c)(2)(C) and (D), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, provide that relevant conditions and all nonmonetary terms of the offer be stated with particularity.”
  • where intent of release condition could not be determined without resort to clarification or judicial interpretation, release was not sufficiently particular and proposal for settlement would not support award of attorney's fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torpy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.