Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of New Jersey· 4/25/2013

Nicholas v. Mynster

Citations

  • 213 N.J. 463
  • 64 A.3d 536
  • 2013 WL 1760434
  • 2013 N.J. LEXIS 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that despite his experience in treating carbon monoxide poisoning, plaintiff’s expert was not equivalently credentialed because he specialized in internal, preventative, and hyperbaric medicine, whereas defendant physician specialized in family and emergency medicine
  • stating that except in limited circumstances not relevant to this appeal, the standard of care must be established by expert testimony
  • recognizing appellate courts review summary judgment motions de novo and accord no deference to the judge's conclusions on issues of law
  • recognizing appellate courts review summary judgment motions de novo, and accord no deference to the judge's conclusions on issues of law
  • explaining that plaintiff’s medical experts must possess the statutory credentials necessary to testify against defendant physicians”
  • advising that in order to understand a statute it is important to \view the statute's constituent parts to see how each piece operates within the overall scheme\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Albin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Nicholas v. Mynster

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.