Skip to main content

Nguyen v. State

Citations

  • 1 S.W.3d 694
  • 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 102
  • 1999 WL 734873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[t]he context of the entire organized crime statute gives clues to the meaning of undefined words”
  • stating that “we cannot interpret a phrase within a statute in isolation”
  • the phrase “carrying on criminal activities” in § 71.01(a) (combinations) implies doing more than one thing
  • phrase implies continuity, and is not satisfied by joint commission of a single crime
  • “[W]e endeavor to give effect to the whole statute, which includes each word and phrase, if possible. . . . [W]e cannot interpret a phrase [or word] within a statute in isolation[.]”
  • offense of engaging in organized criminal activity requires proof that combination was an ongoing enterprise, not the collaboration of its members to commit a single crime; the language implies “an element of continuity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

165 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Nguyen v. State

55 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.