Ninth Circuit· 8/30/1990
Newton v. National Broadcasting Co.
Citations
- 930 F.2d 662
- 1990 WL 277393
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to foresee the possible implications of a statement does not give rise to liability against a public figure, rather the relevant inquiry is one of subjective intent
- noting that the defendant was not liable for defamation because the plaintiff did not establish that the defendant “intended to convey the defamatory impression at issue”
- holding it was error under Bose to conclude “that the jury could have based a finding of actual malice on a determination that the journalists’ testimony about their state of mind was not credible”
- “[W]e read Bose and Harte-Hanks as creating a ‘credibility exception’ to the New York Times rule of independent review.”
- “Even an extreme departure from accepted professional standards of journalism will not suffice to establish actual malice * * *.”
- “[W]e must simultaneously ensure the appropriate appellate protection of First Amendment values and still defer to the findings of the trier of fact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin, Nelson, Norris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lino Celle and Radio Mindanao Network Usa, Inc. v. Filipino Reporter Enterprises Inc. And Libertito PelayoSecond Circuit· 2000-04-12· cited 323×
- the Dallas Morning News, Inc. and Steve Blow v. John Tatum and Mary Ann TatumTexas Supreme Court· 2018-05-11· cited 155×
- Clint Eastwood v. National Enquirer, Inc., Clint Eastwood v. National Enquirer, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1997-08-25· cited 66×
- Duc Tan v. LeWashington Supreme Court· 2013-05-09· cited 43×
- Hinerman v. Daily Gazette Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1992-07-15· cited 33×
- Murphy v. Boston Herald, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-05-07· cited 31×
- Leah Manzari v. Associated NewspapersNinth Circuit· 2016-07-25· cited 25×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1991-04-05· cited 23×
- Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Willamette, Inc. v. American Coalition of Life ActivistsNinth Circuit· 2002-05-16· cited 19×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2002-07-10· cited 17×
- Palin v. New York Times Co.Second Circuit· 2024-08-28· cited 15×
- Finebaum v. CoulterSupreme Court of Alabama· 2003-02-07· cited 12×
- Marcus N. Bressler v. Fortune Magazine, a Division of Time Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1992-10-16· cited 8×
- Doug Lair v. Jonathan MotlNinth Circuit· 2017-10-23· cited 8×
- Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.N.D. California· 1993-09-09· cited 7×
- David Thompson v. Heather HebdonNinth Circuit· 2018-11-27· cited 6×
- Tilton v. Capital Cities/ABC Inc.N.D. Oklahoma· 1995-06-19· cited 2×
- Levan v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1999-09-29
- Metabolife International, Inc. v. WornickNinth Circuit· 2001-09-05
- Doug Lair v. Steve BullockNinth Circuit· 2015-09-01
Other cases named Newton v. National Broadcasting Co.
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.