Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 8/30/1990

Newton v. National Broadcasting Co.

Citations

  • 930 F.2d 662
  • 1990 WL 277393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to foresee the possible implications of a statement does not give rise to liability against a public figure, rather the relevant inquiry is one of subjective intent
  • noting that the defendant was not liable for defamation because the plaintiff did not establish that the defendant “intended to convey the defamatory impression at issue”
  • holding it was error under Bose to conclude “that the jury could have based a finding of actual malice on a determination that the journalists’ testimony about their state of mind was not credible”
  • “[W]e read Bose and Harte-Hanks as creating a ‘credibility exception’ to the New York Times rule of independent review.”
  • “Even an extreme departure from accepted professional standards of journalism will not suffice to establish actual malice * * *.”
  • “[W]e must simultaneously ensure the appropriate appellate protection of First Amendment values and still defer to the findings of the trier of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Nelson, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Newton v. National Broadcasting Co.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.