Skip to main content
· 4/5/1991

Federal Case

Citations

  • 930 F.2d 662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that libel liability cannot be permitted for “what was not intended to be said”
  • explaining that in the independent-appellate-review context, the “presumption of correctness” of jury determinations “applies with less force when a factfinder’s findings rely on its weighing of evidence and drawing inferences”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.