Newport Ltd. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment against credit agency on 7 the plaintiff’s “claim that Experian negligently failed to conduct a reasonable 8 reinvestigation” but clarifying that “[w]hether Experian’s failure was also willful . . . is a 9 question to be taken up on remand”
• “the relevant question is whether the government’s decision to 7 defend on appeal the procedural errors committed by the ALJ was substantially justified”
• “Indigency is a factor that the district court 7 may properly consider in deciding whether to award costs.”
• “triable issue of fact as to whether the withdrawal of all floor 7 staff … for up to three and a half hours created an objectively substantial risk of harm to the 8 unsupervised inmates”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).