Skidmore v. Precision Printing & Packaging, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the employer took prompt remedial action when it admonished the harasser and transferred the plaintiff to a new shift
• holding that remedial action was sufficient when it was reasonably calculated to, and in fact did, abate the harassment
• indicating that the cessation of offending behavior is evidence that an employer’s actions were sufficiently remedial
• holding that the district court properly admitted testimony of a psychiatrist who diagnosed plaintiff because the psychiatrist “testified to his experience, to the criteria by which he diagnosed [the plaintiff], and to the standard methods of diagnosis in his field”
• finding that the employer took prompt remedial action when it reprimanded the harasser and transferred the plaintiff to a new shift
• holding district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting 15 psychiatrist’s testimony that plaintiff suffered post-traumatic stress disorder and that “he did not think [the plaintiff] had lied to him or fabricated her psychiatric symptoms”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).