Skip to main content

Newmark v. GIMBEL'S, INC.

Citations

  • 246 A.2d 11
  • 102 N.J. Super. 279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Although generally considered a service transaction, where hairdresser selected and furnished product for use in administration of permanent wave to customer, there was an implied warranty that the product was reasonably fit for the purpose for which it was to be used.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Conford, Collester and Labrecque

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Newmark v. GIMBEL'S, INC.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.