Skip to main content
· 2/19/1965

Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.

Citations

  • 207 A.2d 314
  • 44 N.J. 70
  • 1965 N.J. LEXIS 210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that obviousness of danger should not necessarily preclude recovery in negligence against mass developer of homes
  • explaining certain tort remedies available against builder of home with defective water distribution system that scalded child inhabitant
  • explaining certain tort remedies available against builder of home with defective water distribution system that scalded child inhabitant
  • 'Most of the leading jurisdictions have not hesitated to undo a judicially committed blunder * * * by employing the same means-- judicial decisions'
  • home buyer relies on mass housing developer’s “implied representation that the house will be erected in a reasonably workmanlike manner”
  • strict liability applied to mass producer of homes who failed to install properly a mixing valve for delivery of hot water to sink taps

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.