Newman v. Newman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court-appointed counsel cannot prosecute an appeal on behalf of children but recognizing the right of a guardian ad litem to do that
• The law does not deprive a person adjudicated incompetent of access to the courts . . . rather, provision is made to ensure that such interests are well represented.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Newman v. Newman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 81×
• Lesnewski v. Redvers
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-12-27· cited 9×
• Luster v. Luster
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-04-26· cited 9×
• Newman v. Newman
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-10-04· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Knock v. Knock
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-03-02· cited 74×
• Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. Weiner
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1989-01-10· cited 65×
• Collins v. York
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-02-03· cited 57×
• Cersosimo v. Cersosimo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-09-14· cited 50×
• Cottrell v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-06-06· cited 43×
• Brown v. Eggleston
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1885-09-05· cited 36×
• Lametta v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1952-11-04· cited 32×
• Orsi v. Senatore
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-02· cited 32×
• Kennedy v. Shaw
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-02-28· cited 11×