Newman v. Newman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A father holding property of his minor children as custodian under the UGMA could not use the proceeds of the property to satisfy a court order for support.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sutliff v. Sutliff
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-30· cited 66×
• Cohen v. Cohen
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-06-29· cited 7×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Primm v. Primm
  California Supreme Court· 1956-06-28· cited 243×
• Gudelj v. Gudelj
  California Supreme Court· 1953-07-03· cited 208×
• Armstrong v. Armstrong
  California Supreme Court· 1976-01-28· cited 130×
• In Re Carboni
  California Court of Appeal· 1941-08-27· cited 22×