Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/30/1985

Sutliff v. Sutliff

Citations

489 A.2d 764
339 Pa. Super. 523
1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating, Rule 1701(c) is “intended to prevent a pending appeal from affecting separate disputes between other parties or involving separate subject matter” (original quotation marks omitted)
stating, in the context of a support action by wife, that husband is under a duty, to the extent he is able, to maintain his family’s standard of living at a level consistent with their station in life before the separation.
party entitled to support “should not be penalized for having to resort to time-consuming court proceedings.”
parent's obligation to support his or her minor children is paramount and \well-nigh absolute\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, President Judge, and Beck and Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.