Supreme Court· 3/2/1959

New York v. O'NEILL

Citations

359 U.S. 1
79 S. Ct. 564
3 L. Ed. 2d 585
1959 U.S. LEXIS 1414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that Florida courts had immediate personal jurisdiction over a nonresident by virtue of his presence within the state
explaining that equitable claims are not subject to the Seventh Amendment’s 4 jury-trial right, but legal claims are subject to it
finding that Florida courts had immediate personal jurisdiction over a nonresident by virtue of his presence within the state
enforcement of uniform act to secure attendance of out-of-state witnesses in criminal proceedings is a matter of comity
“A citizen cannot shirk his duty, no matter how inconvenienced thereby, to testify in criminal proceedings and grand jury investigations in a State where he is found.”
Uniform Law to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses in Criminal Proceedings Within or Without a State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frankfurter, Douglas, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named New York v. O'NEILL

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.