Skip to main content
· 2/23/1903

Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. Corkran

Citations

  • 188 U.S. 691
  • 23 S. Ct. 456
  • 47 L. Ed. 657
  • 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1313

Syllabus

<p>A person, for whose delivery a demand has been made by executive authority of one State upon the executive authority of another State under clause 2 of section 2 of Article IV of the Constitution, and who shows conclusively, and upon conceded facts, that he was not within the demanding State at the time stated in the indictment, nor at any time when the acts were, if ever, committed, is not a fugitive from justice within the meaning of Rev. Stat. sec. 5278, and the Federal statute upon the subject of interstate extradition and rendition.</p> <p>If the governor of the State upon whom the demand is made issues a warrant for the apprehension and delivery of such a person, the warrant is but prima facie sufficient to hold the accused, and it is open to him, on habeas corpus proceedings, to show that the charge upon which his delivery is demanded assumes that ho was absent from the demanding State at the time the crime alleged was, if ever, committed.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant cannot be extradited as a “fugitive from justice” if “in fact he was not within the [J-118-2019] [MO: Dougherty, J.] - 4 [requisition] state at the time the [criminal] act is said to have been committed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: PecKham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.