Oregon Supreme Court· 6/29/1896
Nevada Ditch Co. v. Bennett
Citations
- 30 Or. 59
- 45 P. 472
- 1896 Ore. LEXIS 109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An appropriation proper is not made until there has been an actual application of the water claimed, to some benefi- cial purpose, or some useful industry. All rights acquired prior to this time, at whatsoever step in the process, amount simply to a claim of an appropriation[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolverton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re Willow CreekOregon Supreme Court· 1914-10-20· cited 65×
- Smith v. DenniffMontana Supreme Court· 1900-03-12· cited 63×
- Hutchinson v. Watson Slough Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court· 1909-05-08· cited 45×
- United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.D. Nevada· 1980-10-28· cited 41×
- Murphy v. KerrD. New Mexico· 1923-12-20· cited 34×
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesOregon Supreme Court· 2010-03-11· cited 33×
- Oregon Construction Co. v. Allen Ditch Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1902-06-30· cited 33×
- McCall v. PorterOregon Supreme Court· 1902-12-15· cited 33×
- Williams v. AltnowOregon Supreme Court· 1908-04-28· cited 29×
- Sowards v. MeagherUtah Supreme Court· 1910-01-22· cited 28×
- First State Bank of Alamogordo v. McNewNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1928-06-25· cited 25×
- Fort Vannoy Irrigation District v. Water Resources CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 2008-07-10· cited 24×
- Sand Point Water & Light Co. v. Panhandle Development Co.Idaho Supreme Court· 1905-11-10· cited 24×
- Vineyard Land & Stock Co. v. Twin Falls Salmon River Land & Water Co.Ninth Circuit· 1917-08-06· cited 24×
- Steptoe Live Stock Co. v. GulleyNevada Supreme Court· 1931-02-04· cited 23×
- McPhee v. KelseyOregon Supreme Court· 1903-11-23· cited 22×
- Seaweard v. Pacific Livestock Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1907-03-05· cited 21×
- United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictS.D. California· 1958-08-08· cited 20×
- State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court· 1924-03-19· cited 20×
- State ex rel. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1912-10-10· cited 20×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Simmons v. WintersOregon Supreme Court· 1891-06-24· cited 66×
- Wyatt v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1893-01-15· cited 65×
- Barnes v. SabronNevada Supreme Court· 1875-07-15· cited 54×
- Vansickle v. HainesNevada Supreme Court· 1872-01-15· cited 44×
- Hindman v. RizorOregon Supreme Court· 1891-06-24· cited 39×
- Low v. SchafferOregon Supreme Court· 1893-06-29· cited 39×
- Hargrave v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-07-11· cited 37×
- Wimer v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court· 1895-02-11· cited 35×
- Cole v. LoganOregon Supreme Court· 1893-06-29· cited 31×
- Low v. RizorOregon Supreme Court· 1894-06-28· cited 29×
- Drake v. EarhartIdaho Supreme Court· 1890-03-06· cited 21×
- Woolman v. GarringerMontana Supreme Court· 1872-08-15· cited 17×
- Moss v. RoseOregon Supreme Court· 1895-07-20· cited 14×
- Union Mill & Min. Co. v. FerrisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada· 1872-05-28· cited 10×
- Peregoy v. MckissickCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-07-03· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.