Skip to main content
· 7/10/2008

Fort Vannoy Irrigation District v. Water Resources Commission

Citations

  • 188 P.3d 277
  • 345 Or. 56
  • 2008 Ore. LEXIS 518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a member of an irrigation district had an equitable interest in a certificated water right issued to the district
  • commenting that both ORS 540.520(8) and ORS 540.523(3) treat “beneficial use” and “water use [established by a water right certificate]” as distinct
  • observing that, under the Water Rights Act, beneficial use remains “the foundation of an appropriative right”
  • discussing elements of “benefi- cial use” in the context of an irrigation right
  • discussing elements of “benefi- cial use” in the context of an irrigation right
  • discussing history of the appropriation doctrine and the Water Rights Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.