Second Circuit· 3/3/1989
Neu v. Corcoran
Citations
- 869 F.2d 662
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2733
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “we do not decide” matter of deprivation of liberty interest
- summarizing allegations by plaintiff that officials “foreclosed a range of career opportunities and deprived him of the ability to engage in his occupation”
- granting defendant qualified immunity on a stigma-plus claim because “[i]t would not be clear to a reasonable government official that the defamation [the plaintiff] has alleged is a deprivation of a protected liberty interest that triggers due process requirements.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lore v. City of SyracuseSecond Circuit· 2012-02-02· cited 573×
- Valmonte v. BaneSecond Circuit· 1994-03-03· cited 239×
- Velez v. LevySecond Circuit· 2005-03-11· cited 224×
- Michael Krause v. R.O. Bennett, Jr.Second Circuit· 1989-11-01· cited 203×
- Doe v. PatakiS.D. New York· 1998-05-07· cited 192×
- Diblasio v. NovelloSecond Circuit· 2003-09-18· cited 104×
- Doe v. Dept. of Public Safety ex rel. LeeSecond Circuit· 2001-10-19· cited 88×
- Abramson v. PatakiSecond Circuit· 2002-01-23· cited 75×
- Saulpaugh v. Monroe Community HospitalSecond Circuit· 1993-08-27· cited 67×
- Al-Jundi v. Estate OfSecond Circuit· 1989-09-15· cited 55×
- Adams v. New York State Education DepartmentS.D. New York· 2010-11-18· cited 55×
- \ BD\ v. DeBuonoS.D. New York· 2000-01-15· cited 42×
- Edward Vega v. Floyd H. Miller, James C. Desimone, Howard L. English, Carolyn D. Jones, and G. Peter CooneySecond Circuit· 2001-11-29· cited 41×
- Martz v. Incorporated Village of Valley StreamSecond Circuit· 1994-04-07· cited 32×
- Bernard Jones v. Rick McNeeseEighth Circuit· 2014-03-26· cited 28×
- Algarin v. Town of WallkillSecond Circuit· 2005-08-30· cited 22×
- Thomas v. CulbergS.D. New York· 1990-07-11· cited 17×
- Koch v. MirzaW.D. New York· 1994-02-18· cited 15×
- Kane v. KrebserS.D. New York· 1999-04-12· cited 12×
- Lee v. DonnarumaSecond Circuit· 2003-05-15· cited 12×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 10,863×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 4,836×
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court· 1971-01-19· cited 1,666×
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Second Circuit· 1980-01-08· cited 748×
- Gardiner v. A.H. Robins Co.Eighth Circuit· 1984-11-02· cited 214×
- American Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 165×
- Willie D. White v. Richard Frank, Freeman Marshall, City of PoughkeepsieSecond Circuit· 1988-08-24· cited 164×
- Robert W. Hadley v. County of Du PageSeventh Circuit· 1983-08-30· cited 149×
- Robert I. Moore v. Charles Otero, Individually and as Chief of Police, City of Tampa, Florida, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1977-08-12· cited 86×
- Gibson v. GrimmSupreme Court· 1977-03-21· cited 78×
- Judith Rodriguez De Quinonez v. Honorable Julio Cesar Perez, Etc.First Circuit· 1979-05-07· cited 77×
- Miskovsky v. World Publishing Co.Supreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 71×
- Claude L. HUNTLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMUNITY SCHOOL BOARD OF BROOKLYN, NEW YORK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesSecond Circuit· 1976-05-12· cited 70×
- Gentile v. WallenSecond Circuit· 1977-09-15· cited 69×
- Walentas v. LipperSecond Circuit· 1988-11-25· cited 68×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.