Robert W. Hadley v. County of Du Page

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that statements in newspaper articles attributable to sources other than the defendants did not support the plaintiffs liberty claim
• statement made nearly two years after the plaintiffs termination did not give rise to a liberty interest
• “Rule 56 demands something more specific than the bald assertion of the general truth of a particular matter, rather it requires affidavits that cite specific concrete facts establishing the existence of the truth of the matter asserted.”
• “Rule 56 demands something more specific than the bald assertion of the general truth of a particular matter, rather it requires affidavits that cite specific concrete facts establishing the existence of the truth of the matter asserted.”
• “Rule 56 demands something more specific than the bald assertion of the general truth of a particular matter, rather it requires affidavits that cite specific concrete facts establishing the existence of the truth of the matter asserted.”
• no evidence of an unwritten grievance procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).