Nesbitt v. Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• form of reference in “no” vote result statement to existing statutory law failed to comply with ORS 250.035(2)(c)
• both holding that ballot titles for proposed measures that would affect payroll deductions must identify entities affected by measures
• a trial court’s discretion to grant or deny a motion to amend under ORCP 23 A is limited by that rule’s requirement that leave to amend “shall be freely given when justice so requires”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nesbitt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-06-24· cited 11×
• Caldeen Construction, LLC v. Kemp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-08· cited 9×
• Terhune v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-12-21· cited 2×
• Caruthers v. Kroger
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-08-06
• Nesbitt v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-06-05

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Kain v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-03-06· cited 6×