Caldeen Construction, LLC v. Kemp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the court abused its discretion by entering judgment for defendant without granting plaintiffs an opportunity to amend their complaint
• holding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint under ORCP 21 A
• looking to “colorable merit of proposed amendments” in determining whether trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion for leave to amend complaint
• looking to “colorable merit of proposed amendments” in determining whether trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion for leave to amend complaint
• looking to the “colorable merit of the proposed amendments” in deter- mining whether a trial court abused its discretion to deny a motion to amend after an ORCP 21 A dismissal
• trial court abused its discre- tion in denying leave to amend complaint where proposed amendments would not have introduced new claims into case, were proffered in response to defendant’s first respon- sive pleading, and would have clarified plaintiffs’ allegations of causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).