· 12/31/1991
Nernberg & Laffey v. Patterson
Citations
- 601 A.2d 1237
- 411 Pa. Super. 417
- 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4000
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an appellate court is required to evaluate all evidence of record
- “Since a substituted contract is accepted as satisfaction of a pre-existing duty, [it] thus bar[s] the revival of the pre-existing duty following a breach of the [substituted] contract….” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, Cirillo, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.