Skip to main content
· 12/31/1991

Nernberg & Laffey v. Patterson

Citations

  • 601 A.2d 1237
  • 411 Pa. Super. 417
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4000

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an appellate court is required to evaluate all evidence of record
  • “Since a substituted contract is accepted as satisfaction of a pre-existing duty, [it] thus bar[s] the revival of the pre-existing duty following a breach of the [substituted] contract….” (citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Cirillo, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.