Skip to main content
· 5/27/1970

Stewart v. Chernicky

Citations

  • 439 Pa. 43
  • 266 A.2d 259
  • 1 ERC (BNA) 1357
  • 1970 Pa. LEXIS 654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • correction of errors in exclusion of evidence may properly be the subject of a motion for new trial
  • “[a] judgment n.o.v. does not lie for the correction of errors in the admission or exclu sion of evidence, which errors may properly be the subject of a motion for a new trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.