· 5/27/1970
Stewart v. Chernicky
Citations
- 439 Pa. 43
- 266 A.2d 259
- 1 ERC (BNA) 1357
- 1970 Pa. LEXIS 654
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- correction of errors in exclusion of evidence may properly be the subject of a motion for new trial
- “[a] judgment n.o.v. does not lie for the correction of errors in the admission or exclu sion of evidence, which errors may properly be the subject of a motion for a new trial”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.