Skip to main content

Nelson v. State

Citations

  • 553 A.2d 667
  • 315 Md. 62
  • 1989 Md. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that court’s refusal to order a PSI was erroneous
  • holding it was an abuse of discretion for a trial judge to refuse to order a requested presentence investigation based on the costs of such an investigation and the judge’s personal belief that there was no need for it
  • “If the judge has discretion, he must use it and the record must show that he used it.”
  • “If the judge has discretion, he must use it and the record must show that he used it.”
  • “The discretion is broad but it is not boundless. If the judge has discretion, he must use it and the record must show that he used it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.