Baltimore City Police Department v. Andrew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a conflicting statute was preempted by the LEOBR by comparing the statute at issue to one that the Court found could be “harmonized” with the LEOBR because the LEOBR “contained no explicit prohibition” of its requirements
• charge that officer placed suspect in a headlock and threw him against a vehicle was consistent with the general understanding of police brutality
• charge that officer placed suspect in a headlock and threw him against a vehicle was consistent with the general understanding of police brutality
• officer requesting that the circuit court prohibit the BCPD from proceeding with charges against him because the statute of limitations had run

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).