Skip to main content

Nelson v. State

Citations

  • 626 So. 2d 121
  • 1993 WL 437654

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that, as the participation of a recused jurist in the selection of his or her replacement “may itself raise questions of impropriety,” such a practice is to be avoided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, C.J., and Pittman and Banks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.