Oregon Supreme Court· 3/27/1990
Nelson v. Roberts
Citations
- 789 P.2d 650
- 309 Or. 499
- 1990 Ore. LEXIS 39
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permissible to inform electorate of major loss of revenue to general fund
- permissible to inform electorate of major loss of revenue to general fund
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Unis, Fadeley, Van Hoomissen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court· 1995-09-28· cited 79×
- Greene v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 35×
- Aughenbaugh v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court· 1990-03-27· cited 16×
- Nakamoto v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 14×
- Kane v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-25· cited 2×
- Sizemore v. MyersOregon Supreme Court· 2001-08-16· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Reed v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court· 1988-01-06· cited 36×
- Rogers v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court· 1986-04-01· cited 28×
- Sabatini v. Jayhawk Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1974-04-06· cited 26×
- Glerum v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court· 1989-05-26· cited 18×
- Aughenbaugh v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court· 1990-03-27· cited 16×
- Kafoury v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court· 1987-04-28· cited 14×
- Deras v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court· 1990-03-06· cited 11×
- Deras v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court· 1990-01-25· cited 9×
- Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court· 1983-10-18· cited 6×
- Nelson v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court· 1989-10-26· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.