Skip to main content
· 4/6/1974

Sabatini v. Jayhawk Construction Co.

Citations

  • 520 P.2d 1230
  • 214 Kan. 408
  • 1974 Kan. LEXIS 354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Substantial compliance requires compliance in respect to the essential matters necessary to assure every reasonable objective of the statute.”
  • court noted its repeated holding that “an action challenging the validity of a city annexation ordinance can be prosecuted only by the state acting through one of its proper officers, such as a county attorney, district attorney, or the attorney general”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fromme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.