Skip to main content
· 3/30/1984

Neidhardt v. D.H. Holmes Co.

Citations

  • 583 F. Supp. 1271
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18041
  • 37 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1558

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing an obviousness rejection based on evidence of additional antiviral activity “totally dissimilar to any activity previously disclosed for prior art”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.