Skip to main content

NEFEDRO v. Montgomery County

Citations

  • 996 A.2d 850
  • 414 Md. 585
  • 2010 Md. LEXIS 210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that fraud laws were a less restrictive alternative to a law prohibiting remuneration for fortune-telling
  • holding that fraud laws were a less restrictive alternative to a law prohibiting remuneration for fortune-telling
  • holding that fraud laws were a less restrictive alternative to a law prohibiting remuneration for fortune telling
  • holding that fraud laws were a less restrictive alternative to a law prohibiting remuneration for fortunetelling
  • holding that fraud laws were a less restrictive alternative to a law prohibiting remuneration for fortunetelling
  • noting that lawyers and journalists may also make statements that turn out not to be true

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named NEFEDRO v. Montgomery County

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.