Patricia Moore-King v. County of Chesterfield, VA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Justice White’s approach to uphold local laws setting licensing, permitting, and zoning requirements for fortune tellers
• applying Justice White’s approach to uphold local laws setting licensing, permitting, and zoning requirements for fortune tellers
• analyzing a licensing scheme for fortune tellers under the professional speech doctrine and not as a content-based restriction
• refusing to \afford the government carte blanche in crafting or implementing [occupational] regulations” and refraining from \delineat[ing] the precise boundaries of permissible occupational regulation under the professional speech doctrine”
• applying Justice White’s approach to uphold local laws setting licensing, permitting, and zoning requirements for fortune tellers
• finding “the relevant inquiry to determine whether to apply the professional speech doctrine” to be “whether the speaker is providing personalized advice in a private setting to a paying client”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).