Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/14/1977

Neely v. Neely

Citations

563 P.2d 302
115 Ariz. 47
1977 Ariz. App. LEXIS 550

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming an unequal property distribution because the husband spent community property on his girlfriend
affirming an unequal property distribution because the husband spent community property on his girlfriend
affirming an unequal property distribution because the husband spent community property on his girlfriend
affirming an unequal property distribution because the husband spent community property on his girlfriend
“The discretionary power [to divide community property] is very broad and will not be disturbed unless it clearly appears that it has been abused.”
“[T]he form of a bank account is not regarded as sufficient to establish the intent of the depositor to give another a joint interest in or ownership of the deposit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Hathaway, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Neely v. Neely

14 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.