Neal v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \There is no statutory requirement that the plea be in writing and Because we conclude there is sufficient evidence to support under oath.\
• “There is no statutory requirement that the plea be in 10 writing and under oath.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• King v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-11-23· cited 93×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-11-02· cited 56×
• Mosby v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1985-12-12· cited 19×
• King v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-06-08· cited 12×
• Miller v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-01-11· cited 9×
• Michael Fitzgerald Reese v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2015-07-20
• Reese, Michael Fitzgerald
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-10-16
• Stevenson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1966-03-09

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hill v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1965-05-05· cited 54×
• Wall v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-04-08· cited 22×
• MacKenna v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1957-04-03· cited 17×
• Mason v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-03-11· cited 16×
• Foster v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-04-20· cited 8×
• Morin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1961-05-10· cited 6×