Skip to main content

Neal v. State

Citations

  • 688 So. 2d 392
  • 1997 WL 49152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that section 924.051(3) is procedural and applicable to a point raised on appeal where the crime occurred prior to effective date of statute, but appellant was sentenced after that date
  • rejecting arguments that application of section 924.051 would violate the ex post facto clauses of the Florida and United States constitutions, as well as deny the constitutional right of access to courts
  • “the supreme court has held that it is ‘fundamental’ error to order a criminal defendant to pay attorney fees without affording adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard”
  • \[T]he state overlooks the fact that the supreme court has held that it is `fundamental' error to order a criminal defendant to pay attorney fees without affording adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard.\
  • habitualization on two counts of possession of cocaine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.