Johnson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming as unpreserved a claim that defendant received an improper upward departure sentence because the sole reason given for the departure had already been taken into account in computing his guidelines score
• affirming as unpreserved a claim that defendant received an improper upward departure sentence because the sole reason given for the departure had already been taken into account in computing his guidelines score

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maddox v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-13· cited 105×
• Locke v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-21· cited 28×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-13· cited 16×
• Dodson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-22· cited 15×
• Vanderblomen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-24· cited 5×
• Howard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-12· cited 5×
• Kiely v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-16· cited 1×
• Gordon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-29
• Lawson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-09

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-20· cited 248×
• Neal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-10· cited 42×
• Amendments to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(g) & Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-06-27· cited 36×